I also note you tweeted this: https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1056278972789604352 … Since you now accept that Murray's claims about what "the ECHR" has done in "Europe" are simply false, I assume you will be saying so, if you value accuracy? 2/2
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Jonathan Portes Retweeted
So you're saying when you tweeted this: https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1056278972789604352 … you actually meant that Murray's claims were "patently false"? Just trying to understand what you are saying here...
Jonathan Portes added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 96 likes -
Replying to @jdportes @MaajidNawaz and
Or are you saying that you knew Murray's claims were patently false, but sent that tweet anyway? Once I understand your position, maybe I'll be able to clarify..
2 replies 1 retweet 108 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So, to be absolutely clear, when you tweeted "Read this. Seriously." you were fully aware the first paragraph of Murray's article was nonsense? Just trying to understand what sort of endorsement, or lack of it, this was or wasn't.
1 reply 8 retweets 223 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Still dodging I see! To be absolutely clear, if you tweet that you now realise that the Murray article that you tweeted contains a number of patently false claims, I'm happy to accept that. If you won't, I'll just conclude your evasive and dishonest. Up to you.
4 replies 15 retweets 252 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
extraordinary
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.