Since Haskell Book doesn't give the author cash anymore just remember that it's on LibGen.https://twitter.com/argumatronic/status/1042520764136620032 …
it's plausible her *marginal* benefit from future sales may be zero however that's hardly enough to conclude she's been screwed both parties retained attorneys who probably negotiated a resolution these things happen
-
-
I didn't say she was screwed, I said she's not getting paid for her work going into the future IRT the book. Going solely by law, copyright-protection continues after an author's death, and even though the author doesn't get a thing, you'd still be guilty of infringement. 1/2
-
...So even though the author isn't affected, you're still 'in the wrong', legally. But the general, overwhelming /moral/ consensus on these cases is that since the author doesn't benefit/get harmed by it, it's okay. I'm just taking that notion, and applying it to this case.
-
Are Bowie Bonds immoral?
-
No, but it's not immoral to pirate music that the profits of don't go to the creator.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
