Since Haskell Book doesn't give the author cash anymore just remember that it's on LibGen.https://twitter.com/argumatronic/status/1042520764136620032 …
-
-
The only ethical reason she wouldn't receive royalties would be if she didn't write the book. Given that Chris Martin's working with her on *another book,* and seems to be quite happy with how it's going, this implies she's capable of and actively does write books.
-
surely it suggests that she can happily write a book with a specific different person her tweets seem to suggest that a confidential agreement has been reached this implies that her rights have been purchased or similar which isn't obviously the same as "she gets nothing"
-
Given that her access to her own book's website was taken away before this happened, I'm prone to feel she was coerced/left with no real options other than to give up rights, especially if you take into account the tweet right above that one, and . . .
-
. . . the various community anecdotes that've popped up against Chris since she came out with her story, by some generally well-respected people.
-
Have you seen a statement from Chris or are you just concluding from Julie's insinuations and hearsay that he's obviously at fault?
https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1043774982029946881 … -
Yes I saw your subtweet. Other people, including some rather influential and trustworthy ones, in the Haskell community have been bringing out supporting anecdotes against Chris. A statement from Chris hasn't been given, and acting as if a statement from a 1/2
-
single person in itself, without having some proof that goes against *dozens* of trustworthy anecdotes, generally isn't going to suggest someone's innocent. Many people say "I'm not guilty!" This doesn't make them not guilty. Too many trustworthy people having negative anecdotes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
