actively resisting the temptation to write a 70ish tweet thread dissecting why the notion of Holding People Accountable for their political views is in nearly all cases absolutely barmey v busy day here instead the truth of this proposition is left as an exercise for the reader
-
-
i read it like 5 times and it still doesn't make any sense
-
A is the set of all political opinions B is the set of opinions for which people should be Held Accountable B ⊂ A and μ(B) < μ(A)/2 where μ is an appropriate counting measure
-
Maybe a political philosophy is an injection f: A -> B which maps political opinions A to Accountable Opinions B? hm...might be taking this too far
-
all Ethics must be reduced to math so that only mathematicians can be confident that they are acting ethically this would solve a lot of problems
-
ethics are godelian-undecidable, world continues to Just Fuckin Wing It
-
this unironically
-
i wasn't being ironic honestly
-
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa but if no one even knows whats ethical how can you then hold the opinion that men should be judged harshly for the ethical systems they basically picked up from the water in whatever city they last passed through and have considered for 30s max with sub 180iq
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.