I have literally never done this or even considered it
that does seem pretty plausible :/ good implications for me, maybe bad for people generally compared to my prior
-
-
I think two things might be conflated in this thread: ppl who genuinley disagree on policy, and people who are hateful or cultic or otherwise toxic. It doesn't make so much sense to split from the first group, it makes a lot of sense to split from the latter.
-
Why should I be bothered less just because someone wants to indirect their intended harm through the state?
-
well because they could simply be mistaken, in which case good evidence of that will make them change their mind. A true hater never changes their mind in the face of evidence: they're stuck that way.
-
I'm confused by the idea that differing values are really about differing empirical beliefs that this seems to depend on.
-
Sometimes they are, sometimes they are not :) Tho I agree, that finding a "evidentiary niche" for one's values is more common than finding a value niche based on existing evidence.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.