mildly curious what the fraction of photographers are men also seems likely that photos are a case where gender isn't salient to the viewer? if im looking at photos, its unlikely I will look at the photographer's name, no offense to the artists but your output is what compelshttps://twitter.com/womenphotograph/status/1036682733899186176 …
-
-
maybe men take better photos
-
entirely possible at those tails obvs the thought had occurred to me
-
then the differential between orgs is just noise given small sample sizes and randomness of whatever happened to be covered that week since the stats are taken from 'pics of the week' collections
-
that seemed possible but maybe unlikely, would want to simulate it but a random draw of maybe 30 from the same boolean distribution would be seem very unlikely to return 50% in one go and 4ish% in another
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.