new Sin I've noticed: using shitty (weak) arguments for things Spose you have some preference or normative belief, and you try to justify a policy implied by this belief using a transparently (to someone who doesnt share your preference) dumb argument with a positive component
-
-
the library thing bugs me because there is zero daylight between 'this thing is good' and 'this thing should be funded by the government' and being against the latter is universally considered being against the former and it just angries up the blood
-
'this thing is good', so we must procure all the resources of the earth toward creating as much of it as possible make the world into a library of babel it will be a better place
-
this, but unironically
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.