"original peoples" is a totally meaningless term - no currently existing population has any credible claim here
-
-
right but 1. i think Inuit might've been like immigrant wave 2 of 3 (?) and 2. i don't know that the area they ended up inhabiting was previously much inhabited
-
basically the people still in the middle of the damn glacier or the middle of the damn amazon might be the first by virtue of living there being shitty and getting there being hard
-
if you need to be the first population on a whole contiguous body of land then yeah no chance but if you just need to be the first in like a 100 mile radius or something, and it's fine if you had to kill some other losers on the way there,
-
it’s fine if you had to kill some losers either way — killing the losers is an essential part of humanism, we killed the neanderthals (aside from the inbreeding) and we’d do it again
-
sure, just trying to sort of apply the kind of thinking that leads to someone earnestly using a phrase like "original peoples" -- free of sin, basically
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.