hi I'm a machinist and I expect my government to regulate out of control markets that are hurting people, even if it makes rich people slightly less rich
-
-
Replying to @ScubaForDogs
i agree that housing costs are much higher than they need to be and share your stated goal of fixing this problem i am only suggesting that your proposed solution will not lead to the end you desire and in fact will backfire Spectacularly, and poor people will bear the cost
2 replies 0 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
doing the opposite hasn't exactly served us well, forgive me if I disregard conventional wisdom here, because it seems to be constructed entirely to maintain a status quo that is unbearable to the lower 1/3rd or so of the economy
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScubaForDogs
totally--it's awful! and I shout my lungs out about it daily the take from my angle is not: landlords greedy vs not, take greed as a constant over time and judge as you like but house prices are skyrocketing mostly because it's nigh-impossible to build more housing where needed
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @ScubaForDogs
How is building luxury a requirement for building denser? Denser is already more profitable, without having to displace the current demographic of a neighborhood. The density strawman is from rich landowners blocking building in their neighborhoods in the first place.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xptnd @ScubaForDogs
The driver of housing prices is not luxury but simple scarcity of square footage. Consider: $3000 will get you a decaying closet in Manhattan or a palace in St. Cloud, MN Luxury condos in historically poor neighborhoods are gross aesthetically but not the root problem
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot @ScubaForDogs
Yes, and you cure pricing by rent controlling, which is the point. You're replacing a lottery system with a highest bidder system (i.e. rich only) when you remove rent control. This is lateral to density.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xptnd @ScubaForDogs
Oh no Rent control is still a highest bidder system but instead of competition on price you compete on other margins "I have eighty tenants who want every unit. Why should I choose you? What can you offer me that others can't?"
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Maybe I add outrageous key fees. Maybe I never repair the place. Maybe I only rent to ethnicity groups I like. What does it cost me? I'm not giving up any money by treating my tenants poorly. They're all paying below market.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @ScubaForDogs
This already happens no matter what the unit pricing, which is why housing regs exist in the first place. The enforceability is a choice cities make. However at the moment, what you get, is landowners false evicting their tenants, so they can jack prices or build condos.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think this response supports my claims tbqh
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Those are all lateral problems, and fixing them is not the same as fixing density or pricing. We're not just gonna ignore redlining cause rent control exists.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.