say it with me:
BUILDING
APARTMENTS
WITHOUT
CONTROLS
ON
THE
RENTS
OF
THOSE
APARTMENTS
ONLY
ENRICHES
DEVELOPERS
AND
DOES
NOT
DRIVE
DOWN
RENTS
thinking that it does is some neolib "free market" bullshit
-
-
it's true that construction firms and similar will gain if regulations are relaxed to let them Build and Build and Build near city centers where there's a lot of housing demand but in this case it's a win-win game, because increased housing stock is what lets prices fall long
-
. . . term. honestly, if you want to settle on a villain, your best bet is probably the forces that prevent dense building in areas where people want to live; these are mostly middle to upper middle class bougies in single family neighborhoods
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is building luxury a requirement for building denser? Denser is already more profitable, without having to displace the current demographic of a neighborhood. The density strawman is from rich landowners blocking building in their neighborhoods in the first place.
-
The driver of housing prices is not luxury but simple scarcity of square footage. Consider: $3000 will get you a decaying closet in Manhattan or a palace in St. Cloud, MN Luxury condos in historically poor neighborhoods are gross aesthetically but not the root problem
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.