One thing I notice is that all ideologies seem to have some kind of psychosexual underpinning. marxism -- promise of free love after dissolution of families into communes feminism -- leveling of sexual competition monarchism -- tradwives? libertinism?
with a few freak exceptions I bet r-strategists are more successful in monogamisty relationships thats what im betting on anyway
-
-
seems like it'd be the opposite, tho
-
fucking is a lot a lot a lot easier in live-in relationships most Roues dont actually lock down much uterine time is my guess, not enough to make up for that you need a really devoted Ghengis Khan or a full haram to make up for 25 years of regular fucking eg check the Pilgrims
-
ok I'll be more explicit (wishing I could find an article cite but I've stoned that data out of my head apparently) most species are only r or K strategists. some species, however, have _both_ variants in the same population, in different proportions. Humans are like this.
-
in species with external fertilization (a lot of fish) the K strategist males are Chad-like. large and strong and attractive to females. the r strategist males are Virgin-like. small and shy and mostly unattractive to females. how do they reproduce?
-
by cheating, that's how. they wait for a K-male to pair with a female and they rush in and skeet at just the right opportune moment to get some of their juice mixed in with the Chad juice and some fraction of the eggs are gonna be little baby Virgins.
-
yeah I'm familiar with the literature :) one issue >in species with external fertilization
-
why do you think ladies in porn rub the spunk on themselves robot external fertilization is valid
-
f fuck that makes a lot of sense um also its not just in porn
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
here's the entrance to the r-strategist hole: a minority fraction of the male population in a K-strategist "enforced monogamy" society can thrive through deliberate subversion of monogamy norms. Weaponized infidelity.
-
but why tho
-
why? the selfish gene, or something like that
-
its harder to do this than you imagine
-
But seems to be a marker among men with high social standing? Not sure where the causality lies here tho.
-
would guess its relatively easy to swap status for sex, yeah but there arent that many super-high status men and the fraction of the population for whom that appeals is lower than you might guess is my bet
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.