Atheists shouldn’t be offended when they’re called Satanists then. Got it.https://twitter.com/churchofsatan/status/1005278364901564416 …
-
-
Replying to @Sal3CT
So in your logic because wine is a liquid all liquid must be wine?
12 replies 79 retweets 1,139 likes -
Replying to @ChurchofSatan
LMAO! Over 500 likes for the same logic that you literally used when you said satanists are atheists.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Sal3CT @ChurchofSatan
All satanists are atheists. Not all atheists are satanists. It's as simple as that.
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
The analogy of
@ChurchofSatan is perfectly logical. All wine is liquid. Not all liquid is wine.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @William64028899 @ChurchofSatan
All satanists aren’t atheist though. Thanks for stopping by.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sal3CT @William64028899
Satanism is atheistic, therefore if someone isn’t atheistic then aren’t a Satanists. Thanks for playing this round, try again next time.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @ChurchofSatan @William64028899
Says the ironic atheist religious group. Only your version is. Sorry, but you don’t own the definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sal3CT @William64028899
In fact we created the definition. We aren’t ironic, there was no such thing as religious Satanism until we created it in 1966, we wrote the canon of the religion. We defined it, there are not “other versions” there is Satanism or not Satanism.
7 replies 1 retweet 21 likes
lol totally ahistorical cop
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.