the entire reason i went to the brick-and-mortar i did was that it offered an AI major that was 1/3 each computer science, philosophy, and psychology
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @snus_kin @eigenrobot
as far as i ever saw it could not have been less integrated, not that i finished the program or anything
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @snus_kin @chaosprime
and this is bananas to me I took Philosophy of Science and it was one of the more valuable courses I ever took I still think about it a lot and use those frameworks when I set up research agendas something something two cultures http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
yeah, initiation into the mysteries of Popper and Kuhn was one of the things they made sure you got with my interdisciplinary major there and it certainly seems like going around without being armed with that is a terrible idea probably it's ~evil postmodernism~ though
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @snus_kin @chaosprime
I think I disagree with the empirical claim though--that "most proper researchers agree", unless we go all scotsman on "researcher" (which actually would probably be valid) There are some really thoughtful scientists across disciplines but especially in the more mmm . . .
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
more compromised disciplines I see a lot of "I applied The Standard Method, this is Truth, don't argue with my Authority"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.