The PureScript wikipedia page is nominated for deletion again, hooray. It took literally less than a day this time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PureScript_(programming_language) …
-
Show this thread
-
They say it has "not received significant coverage", but this is easily seen to be false. There are at least two bachelor's theses and a master's thesis that I know of implemented in or about PureScript. I'd really like to know what constitutes significant.
12 replies 10 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @paf31
Linking to those theses in the article might help, because they're apparently not easily searchable.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bodil
Oh absolutely we should. I'd like to note that the linked search terms are hardly well thought out though :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm more just amazed that it took such little time for the new page to get binned.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This happened with the Idris page once. Bizarrely, a blog post was considered more notable than several academic papers, so that saved it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.