@pelotom @raichoo `@czaplic made some really good points on the topic here - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/1acyOfxvasA ….
-
-
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@raichoo @czaplic hm, this sounds kind of like the "let's not say the scary word" thing...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pelotom
@missingfaktor@raichoo @czaplic ... but you need to know about the "Monad" type class to understand how 'do' desugaring works2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pelotom
@pelotom@missingfaktor@raichoo No, you don't. It's perfectly fine to consider 'monomorphic' instantiations of bind and return.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @larsr_h
@pelotom@missingfaktor@raichoo (at least, that's what we did in our course)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larsr_h
@larsr_h@missingfaktor@raichoo if you do that, they'll wonder why they can't use do-notation even though they provided those functions :p2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @edwinbrady
@edwinbrady@larsr_h I think I understand... start by teaching a simplified model and gradually enrich it with the full truth2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.