@odersky @ericniebler @Quora But how much of the difference is because it was designed to be Java compatible? It's a great mkting advantage.
-
-
Replying to @BartoszMilewski
@bartoszmilewski@odersky@ericniebler@quora Beyond Java compat, Scala was fundamentally designed to unify class based OO and ML-like FP4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @jamesiry
@jamesiry@BartoszMilewski@ericniebler@Quora What I like about Haskell (and hope to be able to introduce to Scala): it's purity.4 replies 29 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @yminsky
@yminsky Monads used directly are the wrong abstraction for effects because they don't commute. See Oleg's arguments: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/47865 replies 21 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @odersky2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
-
Replying to @sdbo
@sdbo Weird thing is that this notion comes from quite bright minds. I've heard it from@edwinbrady too iirc. I must be missing something1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @edwinbrady
@edwinbrady@sdbo ah sorry, I thought that's what I understood back in IFL13, in a discussion about Monad transformers alternatives.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @edwinbrady
@edwinbrady@eyall I agree that there's are effects which are well genlzd by Eff, but I feel like it's often presented as "fixing" monads.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.