@edwinbrady that's precisely what I meant at codemesh :-)
-
-
-
@clementd Indeed. If your proof relies on the type being right, you need to make sure somehow. We won't stop needing tests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@edwinbrady write one theorem instead :) -
@bishboria the challenge is to work out what that theorem is... - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@edwinbrady OTOH, my big takeaway from@pigworker's 1st Agda course was that unit tests can be types in DT languages: http://pozorvlak.livejournal.com/162233.html -
@pozorvlak@edwinbrady@pigworker My big takeway was utter confusion which wasn't helped by other members of the audience. :( - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@edwinbrady My supervisor taught me to always sanity-check my results by checking 0, {}, 1 etc. I consider that unit-testing my proofs :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.