@raichoo untyped languages don't have types.
-
-
-
Replying to @andreasdotorg
@andreasdotorg@raichoo JavaScript, Python, Ruby, PHP, etc.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@raichoo They're not untyped, they're dynamically typed. Huge difference.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andreasdotorg
@andreasdotorg@raichoo no, they're untyped. They don't have types.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@raichoo Check optimistic type inference in e.g. Dylan, or the new "make it dynamic" feature in OCaml.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @raichoo
@raichoo@andreasdotorg removing types from Haskell. Great feature. Just calling it what it is.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh Dynamically typed languages only know which '+' to use for x+y if they know the type of x and y...@raichoo@andreasdotorg2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @edwinbrady
@edwinbrady@andreasdotorg@raichoo if they know what value x and y are - not type.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@puffnfresh I think you're using a different meaning for 'type' than everyone else in this conversation @raichoo @andreasdotorg
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.