I never saw that one, so I probably shouldn't use it... nice name though
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if you find a good name and manage to be on the first page of Google, someone can always come and make a Holywood film and push you to page 17. Right
@Azumanga? :) -
I don't care which page I'm on, I just don't want to accidentally name it something filthy :)
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
have you run out of childrens' tv characters?
-
There's plenty left, but none of them seemed quite right. You can't pick just *any* character after all. This is very important. I may propose a masters level module on the topic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Clearly not trying hard enough. You need something where the first hit is Roger’s Profanisaurus.
-
Heh. Good plan. I don't want a name that's accidentally filthy, but deliberately filthy, well, that would be a different matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"elaborating" - i see what you did there.
-
I was going to protest that it wasn't deliberate but then I remembered that it was.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's a good thing you're not elaborating, because when I wanted to learn more about the elaborator, I tried Googling "idris elab" and Google was *convinced* I meant something else...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.