Don't know about others, but my usual approach is that if I understand your paper, my starting point is at least "weak accept". Not that that stops me being Reviewer 2 sometimes, of course, but I'm not going to suggest accepting something that merely *looks* clever.https://twitter.com/jjcarett2/status/1118639017988378624 …
-
-
Replying to @edwinbrady
And for the contrapositive position: if I don't understand your paper but I should (i.e. it's a topic I know a fair bit about), I start from "weak reject". If the concluding results seem outstanding and I can't find errors, I'll move up from that.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Replying to @jjcarett2
Seems a reasonable position to me...
3:39 PM - 17 Apr 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.