Subrena Smith recently argued that “evolutionary psychology, as it is currently understood, is…impossible.” Here is my response: https://grasshoppermouse.github.io/2020/01/21/is-evolutionary-psychology-impossible/ …
H,C&F: "We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language" I interpret them "there was no selection for language specifically" Disagree?
-
-
Well the authors have been criticized for wanting to have it both ways. They claim that language is biologically ‘special’ and has ‘appeared’ in humans (not driven by communicative function) but this is odd in an evolutionary sense. This is them backing out..
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.