Data from the @EIAgov International Energy Outlook 2017: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/
-
-
Show this thread
-
HT
@EverettKWheeler, who first showed the shift in expected coal use for China, which drives the global outlook:https://twitter.com/taykuy/status/908374396032749568 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For more charts on the future of coal, see:https://www.ft.com/content/82f9087c-9cdd-11e7-8cd4-932067fbf946 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any macro (Coal, Healthcare spend, etc.) projection that goes out to 2050 is not only wrong, but improperly anchors the reader
-
Up to a point. We shouldn't treat any forecast as a revealed truth, I agree. But does it help frame thinking about the future? I think so
-
The EIA view on coal "helped" US coal companies frame their thinking. They raised debt for acquisitions and expansion, and went bankrupt.
-
Agreed. Exactly the point I am making: forecasts inform decision-making, but can't be relied on. That's true of these new projections, too
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"new policy scenarios"
-
It's the "reference case" in the EIA's terminology
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Look under the hood and the big thing that's changed in
@EIAgov's projections isn't gas or renewables, but GDP growth and resulting demand.pic.twitter.com/RKMh967gKJ
-
Interesting thanks. Still true that coal affected more than gas or oil by the GDP downgrade. And renewables revised up. Coal's share shrinks
-
Is this declining energy demand due to GDP downgrade or more energy efficiency, or both?
-
A slow-down in projected economic growth. EIA upward-revised their projections for the energy-intensity of GDP.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good, now we urgently need it's use to decrease. Fast fast fast!
#coalThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coal is dead. Time for the funeral. Time to move on.
-
Wind/solar don't work & gets Obama's buddies millions of our money.We pay N. Korea and Iran BILLIONS to build "nuclear plants", but we can't
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
See also: oil...?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And of course, that means Trump is firmly behind coal. Because Mr 4 times bankrupt can't pick a winner.
@realDonaldTrumpThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.