Marco Valente

@eccemarco

carpenter of the intellect in the sustainability field | weaving together the intelligence of the whole with dialogue to work on complex challenges | MSLS'er

Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @eccemarco

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @eccemarco

  1. 2. velj

    "Long term investors' focus on sustainability is a value-driven imperative, not a values-driven agenda", says CEO of State Street

    Poništi
  2. 1. velj

    "No one knows everything, because there is no everything to know". Clifford Geertz

    Poništi
  3. 1. velj

    Sensible piece on some glaring blind spots of management consulting, by

    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    (coming up next week: I *really* need to write a blog post how I critically read non-fiction books using my critical lens of philosophy of science and my way of testing the book's central hypothesis. stay tuned). 6 <end>

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    Insofar as a leadership book gives great advice, action-research style, I think it is legitimate to try things out as a hypothesis. But very often the claims "leaders who do these 5 things succeed" are implying causality where there is none. 5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    Good books to get that type of thinking: 's Superforecasting. 's Drunkard's Walk. Taleb's Fooled by Randomness and Black Swan. 4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    On success of forecasters, for instance, Tetlock has done a great job at eliminating mere noise and chance that act as confounding variables. Taleb (insufferable as he is) explained clearly how we see causes of success where there is mere chance. 3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    Great books on success of leaders take into account not just success stories, but crucially failure stories too, in a non-naive way that accounts for confounding variables and the inevitable role of chance on success. 2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 31. sij

    A ton of leadership magazines articles (in spite of some good stuff published) largely ignore the role randomness on leaders' success. Naive inductivism, magical thinking, and assumed-causality-where-there-is-none are still pervasive. 1

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 31. sij

    It's not "data is", but "data are". On how data are contingent and need to be read contextually. Useful towards a participatory theory of knowing and doing in complex systems

    Poništi
  11. 30. sij

    Just made a contribution to The Guardian to help them keep going on their coverage of climate change, and to support them after they are publicly refusing any ad money from fossil fuel companies

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    Santa Fe institute has a good video on Feigenbaum's constant as well

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    The route to (deterministic) chaos, Feigenbaum's constant, and the universality of chaos, explained by in this video

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    Refusing money from fossils is the right thing to do, whilst it includes a financial risk. This is what put so much pressure on South African companies and government who backed the Apartheid regime

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    Sincere congratulations to you, for refusing to take money from fossil firms. It is a risk because it hurts your business in the short term (Tomorrow I will make a donation and I invite you strongly to do the same)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    It is actually invigorating for me to scout around and see so much good work done by others. It puts me in a mindset of humility, curiosity to learn, and reminds me that I don't have to do it all by myself (which is illogical and impossible)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    Add to the list of cognitive biases the following: "But I was not involved". It cannot be good work / a good theory because *I was not part of it*. Perhaps it is indeed a great idea, but a quick way to dismiss it is to think I was not involved = it's bad

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    I'm so excited that our piece on and came out today! Hoping this will help us all be a little better at and also a little kinder to ourselves and one another. via

    Poništi
  19. 28. sij

    "How do make sure we have a sufficiently diversified set of experiments, testing at times competing hypotheses concurrently as well as how articulated experiments can build on each other?" Good piece

    Poništi
  20. 26. sij

    A summary of the talks in Davos, with trillions of reasons to care about climate change (the billionaires may have not been swayed by Greta's good work, but they are afraid of existential risks to their companies) via

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·