But those on the outside would say >> Deal with it.
"The game has changed and you’re either going to work within the new system or you’re going to have to get out," @PattiSolisDoyle.https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/2020-democrats-debates-1302646 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Those small-dollar donor thresholds could go up for the next debates, making crossing 65k more important. And that could stress out donors: "If we’re going to do that for the next year, it’s going to be very stressful for voters and campaigns.”https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/2020-democrats-debates-1302646 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It seems like a good policy, ensuring that candidates have a wide enough base to be relevant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there anything about our system that doesn’t need updating & streamlining. Can we just advance to the last century? Seem to be going backwards here
-
It was a change made after 2016 to make the field more egalitarian.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They had no choice. The sheer stupidity of
@TheDemocrats that was on display was embarrassing to the political process. You had idiots who no one had ever let alone have any business in the Oval Office. Our country is a laughing stock.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One thing for sure is that
@politico has zero informative insights into the DNC and Democrats in general.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thin the herd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.