I wouldn’t! They’re born perfect and there are very few pros to it
Circumcision can cause meatal stenosis, a condition that makes the opening smaller and is almost exclusively a problem for circ’d boys. It doesn’t follow that because one baby had pain peeing + may have benefited, that circumcision is beneficial to any other particular boy.
-
-
There is no other body part belonging to a child that you would amputate “just in case”. Why is the foreskin any different? It’s there to protect the head of the penis and greatly increases physical sensitivity (ie sexual enjoyment).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.