Is there going to be further discussion in the WG with actual spec text, or did I miss it?
-
-
Replying to @gregwhitworth @ecbos_ and
This is just for us - but up for discussion in the WG with spec for the mapping.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
what does "just for us" mean - are you limiting it to certain hosts?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bfgeek @gregwhitworth and
E.g. we are looking into: 1) Removing -webkit-box-lines, -webkit-box-flex-group. 2) Mapping -webkit-box onto flexbox.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bfgeek @gregwhitworth and
3) And for -webkit-line-clamp leaving as is. We'll try and limit the number of -webkit-box-* properties which can be used with it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bfgeek @gregwhitworth and
We'd love to have a more flexible version of line clamp at some point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @smfr @gregwhitworth and
Yeah, I think
@eae /@tabatkins have some thoughts here.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@smfr any thoughts on removing -webkit-box-lines, -webkit-box-flex-group, % values of -webkit-line-clamp from webkit? We got UseCounters...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I feel like at this point, let's just save this discussion for TPAC to be minuted
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Sounds like a good idea.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.