2014 is recent enough for studies, there aren't new ones out there.
-
-
Replying to @LadyMolly736
Here's an article about a Harvard study: http://lgbtweekly.com/2016/02/09/study-from-harvard-and-yale-shows-positive-psychological-effects-of-hormone-therapy-in-transgender-individuals/ …
11 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
You seem to be saying that you don't think I care about rigor, but that is really, really not a good answer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyMolly736
I don't think you're in good faith or that I can get much fruitful out of a discussion with you on this bc of your poorly chosen link.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To me it seems like you are saying, I don't have to listen to your valid criticisms of this study because I don't like a link you posted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyMolly736
Yes, I'm saying your credibility's shot if you approvingly link something that bad. Bc you're only able to think critically in one direction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq @LadyMolly736
I'm capable of evaluating research methods without your help. You're the one who struggles to be critical of anything supporting your biases
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you link to a study, then I will respond by looking at it and commenting on it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyMolly736
You can feel free, but I'm not required to chase that rabbit with you. I explained the link was an example of what was wrong with yours.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, I get it. Your link was to an article about a study and my link was to a different kind of article.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Your link was to a bad article, and I wanted you to understand the difference between a good one and a bad one. You don't seem to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.