That science doesn't matter BECAUSE TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN. Etiology is irrelevant to that simple fact. @v_urq
-
-
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque If this is the best you can do- restatement ad infinitum- then I see no reason why ebaz or anyone else should believe you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
You've literally bought into transphobic framing of transness and you're too dense to realize it.
@v_urq2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque Another statement of fact for everyone to take on faith? Guess I'll just go cry now you've proven I am dense by saying so.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
There was a really good article in Nature, I believe, that the best evidence of someone's sex is just asking them. I can't find it.
@v_urq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque@v_urq Here. http://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943 … "if you want to know whether someone is male or female, it may be best just to ask"2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Galaxie_Ranger
@Galaxie_Ranger@emily_esque This is absolutely my view as well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@Galaxie_Ranger Then all that bullshit about needing an etiology is bullshit. The best scientific evidence of gender is self-id.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@emily_esque @Galaxie_Ranger The best current evidence, sure. But people of good will can disagree on the question.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.