Evan Urquhart

@v_urq @emily_esque this is also true of Cis women then, not cause of biology, as your own case proves. So why the special mention for TW?

@v_urq @emily_esque I.e. Women (Cis + Trans) are women because they say they are not anatomy. Why do you insist on separating out TW?

@v_urq @emily_esque you don't seem to understand the logical and rhetorical flaw in talking only about TW when it's the case for all women

@torreypeters @emily_esque I hit this language problem all the time in my writing. When I say "women" trans women assume they're excluded...

@torreypeters @emily_esque When I separate out trans women I'm asked why I make it seem like they are different.

@torreypeters @emily_esque Double binds, everywhere, when speaking of trans folks in print.

@v_urq @emily_esque you're a writer, language is supposed to be your responsibility. A carpenter might as well complain about wood

@v_urq @emily_esque try to grow, learn, evolve--rather than complain that writing well is too hard