@v_urq You still haven't addressed the actual language I highlighted as wrongful, by the way.
-
-
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque I did: I asked if you don't feel like a woman.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq Of course I feel like a woman because I am a woman. But@emilybazelon implied that transness is just a feeling. Bad writing *at best*2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque@emilybazelon Do we have a firm understanding of what transness is and what causes it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@emilybazelon No on etiology but we have a firm understanding of its ontology: that trans women ARE women and trans men ARE men.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
@emily_esque As I understand it, we know trans women are women because they feel and say they are. The writing hewed to what we know atm.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@emily_esque this is also true of Cis women then, not cause of biology, as your own case proves. So why the special mention for TW?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @torreypeters
@v_urq@emily_esque I.e. Women (Cis + Trans) are women because they say they are not anatomy. Why do you insist on separating out TW?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @torreypeters
@torreypeters@emily_esque I think we've hit a disagreement! I believe there's a bio/neurochemical explanation, we just don't know it yet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@emily_esque all right, but you are way out on your own here, and given you have no proof maybe error on circumspection2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@torreypeters @emily_esque If it's just feelings/cultural definitions, then a TERF view is as valid as a trans one. I think that's dangerous
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.