The terms lesbian and gay are linguistically insufficient. My latest for Slate will tell you why.http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/04/13/the_terms_lesbian_and_gay_are_linguistically_insufficient.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_tw_top …
-
-
Replying to @malefemme
@malefemme I had a lot of fun writing it. In a way you could compare it to an opening chess move...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@malefemme ...in that I think we need ways to talk about sexual attraction that are more specific than "pan" but less binary than LGB.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @malefemme
@malefemme Agreed- I also think we need terms that don't refer back to the gender of the person experiencing the attraction.
6:48 AM - 14 Apr 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.