@SlateOutward The correct def of bisexual is attraction to your own gender and genders not your own; it would apply. http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/04/13/the_terms_lesbian_and_gay_are_linguistically_insufficient.html …
-
-
Replying to @rebellion_bear
@FermeNoire
@SlateOutward Interesting! I thought people who prefer "pan" complained about bi because it was, well, binary?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@SlateOutward ... and to organizations. Being misrepresented is a big issue. Source: http://www.binetusa.org/bi-presentations …pic.twitter.com/oVxgwFrqfg
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rebellion_bear
@FermeNoire
@SlateOutward This only emphasizes the need for more specific language- ways to talk about who you're actually attracted to.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
@v_urq@SlateOutward See 2nd slide on Bi Identity. I try not to "identity police" and I respect the community's definition and diversity.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rebellion_bear
@FermeNoire
@SlateOutward Uh huh- so I assume you have no problem with people like me adding new terms if they bi is too vague for them?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@FermeNoire @SlateOutward Otherwise, identity policing is exactly what you're doing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.