The terms lesbian and gay are linguistically insufficient. My latest for Slate will tell you why.http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/04/13/the_terms_lesbian_and_gay_are_linguistically_insufficient.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_tw_top …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @laurenmpayne
@laurenmpayne Engage away! Personally, my junk prefs are stronger than my gender prefs. But, I also hoped to make room for thinking about...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
@laurenmpayne ...sexual preferences that allow for more specificity than "pan" does, but in a less binary way than LGB forces on us.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @laurenmpayne
@laurenmpayne I wouldn't stay in a monog relationship with someone whose realignment got rid of their vagina, no. Not all surgeries do, tho.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
@laurenmpayne And, I wouldn't even start a relationship with someone who didn't enjoy being vaginally penetrated.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@laurenmpayne Also, as far as I'm concerned, a vagina obtained through SRS is no different from a vagina obtained elsewhere.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.