The terms lesbian and gay are linguistically insufficient. My latest for Slate will tell you why.http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/04/13/the_terms_lesbian_and_gay_are_linguistically_insufficient.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_tw_top …
-
@v_urq fun article; I can see it winding quite a few people up – though I'm using the comments section to talk about chess openings myself.
@malefemme I had a lot of fun writing it. In a way you could compare it to an opening chess move...
-
-
@malefemme ...in that I think we need ways to talk about sexual attraction that are more specific than "pan" but less binary than LGB. -
@v_urq Yes, binary notions of sexuality quite often aren't very meaningful. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.