None of these narratives are "wrong" in the sense that every one resonates with some people. None of them are "right" in the sense that they don't resonate with everyone. 6/
-
-
Definitely interesting. Somewhat hesitant in responding. Personally, I see us less as having a medical condition, and more that we have a human variance that can benefit from current medical knowledge & practice in order for us to thrive. And that narratives generally suck.
-
I welcome your thoughts! Narratives are how we make sense of the world, and that's both an amazing strength and, often, a hindrance. Seeing GD as a medical symptom makes sense to me for cultural reasons- which I think can and should be challenged...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
fantastic thread, thank you for writing it. i feel like i eternally have a foot in both worlds here because continuity and spontaneity are both necessary but insufficient to describe my experience; and likewise with the 'medical' vs 'identity' dialectic you describe.
-
the best way i've found to capture my experience is to say that i was plural - had a 'true' self who came out only rarely, and a masculine simulacrum who "i" killed when coming out to myself. literally true? maybe not, but the sensation was *very* like ego death via psychedelics
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I feel similarly. I see my transness as a med condition that I needed med help with. A lot of trans people talk about their hair/clothing desires or wanting to be seen (genderwise) by others being big things that made them realize they are trans. This has never resonated with me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.