However, they should not be allowed to harm patients who need this effective and highly stigmatized treatment. That's not evidence based medicine. That's transphobic stigma and moral panic.
-
Show this thread
-
When the evidence changes doctors opinions will change. So will mine. If a wave of AFAB detransitioners ever finally materializes IN THE DATA, we'll listen. But there is no current support for the belief that a main issue in trans medical care is too much ineffective treatment.
4 replies 2 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @e_urq
Can you really not see that wave, it’s already clearly happening
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saturnalea
No support for it in the data. I'll believe in it when it's more than anecdotes, and not a moment before.
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Setting aside detrans experiences as anecdotes too rare to care about is cruel & shortsighted. All detrans stories show where we can do better for any patient dx’d with dysphoria.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saturnalea
It's not about caring, it's about comparing apples to apples. All treatments have failure rates. The data determine which treatments are likely to be helpful, not compassion for those with a poor experience. Trans care should be held to the same standards of other medicine.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
Considering that we are seeing cases like these, and considering we are making irreversible changes based on a model that is still not flawless, it should be held to a higher standard. Why is it a problem when detrans people demand more scrutiny into this model? We want better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saturnalea
It's a problem when trans medical care is held to a standard that no other treatment in the world is subject to. False postives exist in all medicine, as do negative outcomes and treatment-resistant cases.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @e_urq @saturnalea
When you ask whether a treatment is safe and effective, you base it on the total statistical picture, not on making sure the rare negative outcomes never happen.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
Exactly, you base it on the total statistical picture, including the rare negative outcomes. Sweeping the influx of detrans under the rug is not the best move for better transgender healthcare. If we can do better why stop here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Because more patients are harmed by the fearmongering about detransition than helped. Saving 1 person who might have a bad outcome isn't worth the 97-99 who would have thrived with the treatment, especially when the bad outcome isn't fatal or life-span decreasing or anything.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.