In this situation, what would improve healthcare for these patients? A) Destigmatizing the condition and treatment so more patients who need it get it. B) Focus attention on 1-3% for whom the treatment is not effective, try to reduce the number to zero.
-
Show this thread
-
It's A, guys. It's A. I know how tough it must be for detransitioners to have hope for a medical treatment and be in the number of people for whom it didn't work. But, this is very normal, in medicine. It's disappointing. It's tough. These folks deserve support, and empathy.
2 replies 2 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
However, they should not be allowed to harm patients who need this effective and highly stigmatized treatment. That's not evidence based medicine. That's transphobic stigma and moral panic.
1 reply 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
When the evidence changes doctors opinions will change. So will mine. If a wave of AFAB detransitioners ever finally materializes IN THE DATA, we'll listen. But there is no current support for the belief that a main issue in trans medical care is too much ineffective treatment.
4 replies 2 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @e_urq
Can you really not see that wave, it’s already clearly happening
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saturnalea
No support for it in the data. I'll believe in it when it's more than anecdotes, and not a moment before.
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
But is the fact that there’s noaccurate numbers on a tiny ill-defined group like this surprising? Who is asking questions? Who is following up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @saturnalea
There have been studies, though. Imperfect methods, admittedly, but they largely agree with one another. To imagine they all undercounted detransitioners by orders of magnitude is unlikely.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq @saturnalea
When there's no evidence for something, the conservative approach is not to look for reasons the thing exists but has been hidden. That way lies conspiracy theories.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq
There is the wealth of evidence you’re choosing to ignore so there’s that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm afraid there isn't, unless you mean personal stories? What is a respectful way that I can say that personal stories aren't relevant to the question of how common a phenomenon is, statistically speaking?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.