And that kinda fucks with the immutability argument, doesn't it. I have a short story, that I've told on here before. It's about Sandy Stier, one of the plaintiffs in the Prop 8 case in California that was going to re-ban marriage equality.
I think you'll probably hate this, but I see bisexual and gender fluid people as free riders- the rights are necessary for people who don't experience fluidity, and the people who do are able to, happily, benefit.
-
-
I'm not sure I understand this point- are you using bisexual to mean bi people in het relationships?
-
I mean someone who could, theoretically, choose to limit their marriage options to opposite-sex people out of the people they're attracted to.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I do hate it!
-
Heh. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'd still be completely in favor of LGBTQ rights on the basis of freedom... but I don't think it's necessary to base them in liberty rather than 'born this way' given enough people for whom 'born this way' is accurate, which we definitely have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.