At this point, we’ve officially established that the part of language we usually pay attention to is a whole-ass convoluted mess.
Oh, but it gets better. 
Because our minds have a whole mechanism that’s used to translate language.
-
Show this thread
-
At its most basic, the brain saves time and energy by collapsing things it can categorize into a symbol it uses as a callsign. So when I say “man”, your brain doesn’t bring up every man it’s ever seen. Instead, it brings up a symbol that represents the category of “man”.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
This is one of the most brilliant evolutionary aspects of the brain. Internal Artifacts give us the ability to think fast and efficiently, and to recognize the properties of whole categories of objects without too much thought. What could go wrong? I’m glad you asked.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
Since each person grows up differently, and has unique experiences, the symbols (IAs) that our brain uses to collapse a particular category are different. For example, if you say “tree”, my brain will find the context and then bring up an IA that corresponds to that context.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
In my mind, I see the Maple tree that I made a fort in. I get a warm feeling from a good memory. But in your mind, it might be the tree that you fell out of and broke your back, and the memory might feel dark and cold. So the same EA can lead to us seeing very different IAs.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
This is just one word. Every word in our language is an example of this, though the most obvious differences are found in nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Internally, these artifacts aggregate into our individual perception of “The World”.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
In simple, practical terms: everyone lives in their own little world. This is something we don’t take seriously enough. While external phenomena have their own genuine reality, it’s a reasonable bet that not a single person alive has ever actually fully seen it.
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
When we’re arguing about something like gender, one of the things we’re actually doing is asking the other person to change the way their minds categorize a symbol. And if they’ve put that much stock in it, changing the way they see that symbol can literally break their world.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
This is part of why we see so many arguments from transphobes about how “gender ideology is destroying the world”. It isn’t destroying the larger world: it can’t. But it deeply threatens the complex matrix of Internal Artifacts that they’ve used as for organizing perception.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Kinysis
This is something I experienced and continue to experience. I once had very strict IAs for m/w based on secondary sex characteristics. Accepting myself and other trans people led to shifting those, but I still struggle to call any idealized form to mind for "nonbinary person".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
When I was first confronting those and trying to grow beyond "trans people are valid IFF they pass to my idiosyncratic satisfaction" it was actively painful. I FELT man and woman as objective, unchanging, and eternal. I KNEW what a man was and what a woman was.
-
-
It was a huge barrier to accurate pronoun production. Even if I wanted to be polite and believed trans people were valid my mind kept telling me it was sure who was a man and who was a woman very strongly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm at a point now where the first pronouns I learn for a person "rule" my perception of them which is ALSO quite problematic, but at least a bit better. The goal is to have the pronouns in charge and able to change quickly, and I hope I'll get there.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.