I'll give you the benefit of doubt and think that you believe what you write. But be an actual journalist then, look into the science, ALL OF IT and present it balanced including those you avoiding to even read. Please.
-
Most important word in this tweet is "if". Like I said, I've personally interviewed Steensma. He agreed that desistance numbers have been going steadily downward as diagnostic criteria have improved, and really downplayed the difference between his method and affirming methods.
He believes approaches should be individualized and blockers etc can be good tools in the right context, but you have to look at what's best for the individual child & family.
-
-
And, he's the desistance guy. He might be a bit more conservative in his watchful waiting approach but it's not the complete different paradigm it's made out to be.
-
The uncertainty around the issue (w/kids) underscores the ethical problems around sports. Contrary to your claims in the article, many kids participate in sports for reasons other than just health and comaraderie. Not fair to them to blur categories based on self-ID.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.