Evan Urquhart

I gave you a screenshot. It says "it's not precisely eugenics". Are you... obsessed with the word analogy? Weird.

Not sure what could be more specific than "it's not precisely eugenics" lmao

It doesn't "very specifically say it's an analogy that is useful but not perfect and shouldn't be mistaken for saying they're one and the same", it says "it's not precisely eugenics" in one place, while calling it eugenics in others.

Even if you had called it an analogy, what a grossly offensive analogy that is, to use deliberate programs of racist mass sterilization as an analogy for entirely reasonable requests for male athletes to stay in their lanes.

No, it consistently says it's a useful framework (ie, not the exact same thing). You're just being overly literal for some reason. And, no, it's not. It's a useful framework, an analogy, if you will.

I'll give you the benefit of doubt and think that you believe what you write. But be an actual journalist then, look into the science, ALL OF IT and present it balanced including those you avoiding to even read. Please.

Bottom line is that Evan holds a core article of faith that being "Trans" is some deep unambiguous unalterable spiritual condition, in spite of all the evidence saying otherwise.