Not to be rude about your work, but if you had, in the end, after all that struggling, found a genuine way to justify the comparison, wouldn't you have put it in the article?
-
Even if you had called it an analogy, what a grossly offensive analogy that is, to use deliberate programs of racist mass sterilization as an analogy for entirely reasonable requests for male athletes to stay in their lanes.
No, it consistently says it's a useful framework (ie, not the exact same thing). You're just being overly literal for some reason. And, no, it's not. It's a useful framework, an analogy, if you will.
-
-
Here Is why not in a screenshot. These are bills aimed at fair opportunities for women/girls in sports and not letting children deicide on non life saving but life altering medical interventions. And you know it! Your so called analogy crumbles like a house of cards.pic.twitter.com/oUz5zrda6u
-
I'll give you the benefit of doubt and think that you believe what you write. But be an actual journalist then, look into the science, ALL OF IT and present it balanced including those you avoiding to even read. Please.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.