If you're going to read a different meaning into my words when I went on to very clearly explain what I meant by "struggling with that" I can't stop you, but I can say you're being disingenuous to the extreme.
That's one spot where it's made clear, but it's threaded throughout the article. Eugenics is a useful framework for describing what these bills aim to do. I never say or imply it's precisely the same thing. If you don't like the analogy, that's fine. I think it's a useful one.
-
-
I'm looking in vain for the bit where you "very specifically say it's an analogy that is useful but not perfect and shouldn't be mistaken for saying they're one and the same". And by the last paragraph you're talking flatly without qualifiers about "anti-trans eugenics".
-
I gave you a screenshot. It says "it's not precisely eugenics". Are you... obsessed with the word analogy? Weird.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.