Evan Urquhart

OK, abortion and birth control. Surely that's all. Au contraire, mon frere. The use of anti-trans organizing to sneak traditionalist anti-women's equality ideas into the mainstream wouldn't dream of coming for your legal abortion and legal birth control and leaving it there.

Conservatives believe that biology is destiny, and that a woman's destiny is to be a wife and mother. They believe that the female sex is the weaker and should be protected by, but also subordinate to, the male. Are you starting to get it?

By pushing anti-trans attitudes that focus on biology, they're able to target women with anti-feminist, biological essentialist attitudes, without cis women realizing they're the real target.

Their focus on procedures that make trans men infertile (this is always talked about in the context of fertility of "girls" and "daughters"), reinforces the idea that womanhood must always aim for motherhood. For them, it is the only legitimate purpose and role for a woman.

At the same time (but louder) they stress women's vulnerability to male predators in bathrooms, and their athletic weakness compared to cis male athletes. They pretend this is about trans women. It is not. It's about reinforcing cis women's inherent vulnerability and weakness.

Added all together, we have a coherent worldview: Women are their biology and nothing more. They are weaker than men and in need of male protection. Their purpose in life is motherhood, and the state has a role in maintaining their fertility regardless of their wishes.

This is an ideology that masquerades as scientific truth, built on misleading half truths. Nothing about the biological ability to carry a pregnancy entails a moral responsibility to do so, much less that it is one's only legitimate purpose or function.

Female bodies are, on average, shorter and less muscular than male bodies due to the action of a specific hormone, testosterone, on mammalian biology.