I'm too tired for your ridiculous word games. The language we speak in this country is English, in English mammary glands are called breasts, females use them to feed the babies they have given birth to. There's no sane argument to change it, it serves only to dehumanise women.
-
-
Replying to @scrapegroat
I genuinely object to being called insane for asking a question you can't answer. It's not polite, and makes me suspect you're not coming to this discussion with an open mind or a willingness to be rational about things.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
You're clever word game has no relevance to the offensive nature of trying to take the female-acknowledging language out of gestating and feeding a baby, a uniquely female process. If a transman grows a baby in their actual womb and they still have functioning breasts then
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scrapegroat @e_urq
well done them, for taking part in this very very female process, but changing the language of breastfeeding is a nonsense. If they are men, then it's intolerant to imply that renaming a body part makes it any more or less male. Renaming breastfeeding implies that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scrapegroat @e_urq
there are people who are simply in denial about the fact that this is a female process - changing the word doesn't change the organ you use or the act itself of the physical body you need to be in to do it. There isn't a sensible sediment for it. And I didn't call you insane
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scrapegroat
No, it just makes certain trans men more comfortable. Is there a reason why them being more uncomfortable giving birth is necessary? Do you hate trans men so much you want them more uncomfortable giving birth? I've heard it's quite uncomfortable already.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq @scrapegroat
It might make them more likely to breastfeed if comfortable language is used. This would be healthier for their babies. Is there a reason you don't think their babies wellbeing should come first, here?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
Why dehumanise the 50% of the population who already have to fight tooth and nail to get adequate medical research and support for their specific needs, for the sake of a tiny subset of people with bodies capable of gestating a baby when it serves literally no logical purpose?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @scrapegroat
What's dehumanizing about a trans man using a different word? This is why I was asking about English vs other languages. It's not dehumanizing if different syllables are sometimes used to refer to the same things, surely?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @e_urq
Yeah if they use both terms depending on what the person feeding is comfortable with it's not really an issue I'll concede. I incorrectly thought that they were being told never to say breastfeeding. Have read beyond a headline and - hands up, my mistake. Apologies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Thank you so much for saying so! It takes a rare person to say they were misinformed- I'd have been perfectly satisfied if you quietly changed your mind after learning the facts and said nothing.
-
-
Replying to @e_urq
I hate being wrong but better to admit it. Take care.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.