There's a clever little trick behind the outrage over "chestfeeding" as a suggested alternative (not replacement) to breastfeeding, and the reason it works is, once again, say it with me: TRANSMASCULINE INVISIBILITY.
-
-
But if you're unable to conjure the imagine of a trans man to your mind, because of transmasc invisibility, you make trans women the culprits (as always) and ascribe some sort of evil motives of jealousy and hatred of cis women to them.
Show this thread -
And, presto! By making trans men disappear, you've turned a relatively simple issue of some trans AFABs feeling more comfortable with alternate language into this ominous sign of the erasure of women.
Show this thread -
Of course, more advanced transphobes know that trans men are the people for whom "chestfeeding" applies, and they have their own baroque reasoning about why trans men are really poor lil deluded women in need of saviors to stop them being trans.
Show this thread -
But for your average person "chestfeeding" only activates their prejudices bc they're NOT thinking of trans men, rather than bc they think trans men are women who need to be reminded of what sex they are.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(I appreciate the larger point of this thread but I feel like people like Shrier have been pretty clear on finding it terrifying + Ultimate Unsexy Breasts goes a long way; people aren’t approaching transmasculine visibility neutrally when they do approach it.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But why? No one feeds from a chest. Men have breasts, that’s how they can get breast cancer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Men have breasts so “chest feeding” is unnecessary. The End
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.