I've got that "so-and-so declined to be interviewed on the record and, when offered the opportunity to dispute specific facts on background, further declined to do so" kind of journalism-y feeling. It's a feeling like you have someone dead to rights, and they know it.
I think my record of scupulously ethical, well researched, and factual journalism speaks for itself, Sarah. Would you believe I've never once had a source complain about being misquoted or treated unfairly in my reporting thus far? It's true!
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not really, I mean, sometimes people have to speak to skeptical journalists if they want their side of a story to be told. Being skeptical of a source surely can't disqualify me. Unless you're saying they don't trust me because I'm trans?
- Show replies
-
-
-
"no one's complained" - ah, the gold standard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Scrupulously ethical, well researched, and factual” like this? Pull the other one. https://slate.com/human-interest/2020/06/jk-rowling-trans-men-terf.html …pic.twitter.com/OpwU13QnKB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.