Gillick is for when there is a clear treatment pathway that has well-understood benefits and potential downsides. Children were being given treatment when it wasn't understood what the effects were, which impacts whether informed consent can be given.
-
-
But, that doesn't describe PBs, which have been prescribed for decades and are well understood?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq @AbsMcFabs and
Do children need to demonstrate Gillick competence to be treated with the same drugs at the same ages for early onset of puberty?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Your last two tweets demonstrate that you haven't read the judgment.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AbsMcFabs @e_urq and
Abigail McGyn Retweeted Judicial Office
Here's a link. https://twitter.com/JudiciaryUK/status/1333732359804489729?s=19 … Do have a read, it answers all your questions and it lays it out very clearly.
Abigail McGyn added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Read it last night, but I'm still confused why trans medical care is treated differently than other treatments, even treatment with the exact same drug in the exact same age children?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @e_urq @AbsMcFabs and
It seems to me, from reading the judgment, that the judges were persuaded that PBs lead to transition. But since they dont when used in cis children it must not be the drugs themselves that cause this outcome. In which case there must be another, non-medical aspect...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They are not used in the same way for precocious puberty. As is discussed in the judgment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They're used in the same dosages for the same effect. What does "in the same way" mean other than that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, not for the same effect. Most commonly in the case of a gender dysphoric girl, they've already started their periods and the Lupron throws her into immediate menopause, with all those symptoms. There is no evidence that puberty resumes when you stop it from age 14-16.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That's an argument for using it earlier- which I believe is the best practice, to use at first onset of puberty (2 yrs on average b4 1st menses). But the decision stops it being used that young while allowing it for 16 plus. Surely that's not logical at all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.