Well then it sounds like the standards are consistent.
-
Here's a link. https://twitter.com/JudiciaryUK/status/1333732359804489729?s=19 … Do have a read, it answers all your questions and it lays it out very clearly.
Read it last night, but I'm still confused why trans medical care is treated differently than other treatments, even treatment with the exact same drug in the exact same age children?
-
-
It seems to me, from reading the judgment, that the judges were persuaded that PBs lead to transition. But since they dont when used in cis children it must not be the drugs themselves that cause this outcome. In which case there must be another, non-medical aspect...
-
...of the treatment that is the source of the objection. But the judgment didn't answer my questions about whether other non-medical treatments such as talk therapy require extensive research and Gillick hearings?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.