This is an interesting conversation, but I think there's more we need to acknowledge when thinking about asexual inclusion in the LGBTQ movement, and why it can feel like an odd fit.https://slate.com/human-interest/2020/09/asexuality-queer-umbrella-question.html …
-
-
Rigorously enforced sexlessness in public life was the dominant culture at the dawn of the modern LGBTQ rights movement (which was then known as the gay rights movement). Gay rights began with a rebellion against prudishness and sexlessness.
Show this thread -
Prudish anti-sex attitudes are at the bedrock of many conservative beliefs. Women who seek abortions or birth control are stigmatized for having sex. Racism around the welfare system is based in disgust that nonwhite people are having sex.
Show this thread -
There is stigma against asexuals- I'm not remotely saying there isn't. But, we still have stigma against sexuals at the same time.
Show this thread -
Again, I don't mean this as an argument against including asexuals in the LGBTQ umbrella. They are a sexual minority, they experience stigma, let em in.
Show this thread -
But, let's acknowledge it's awkward bc the Gay Rights movement was rooted in rebellion against a culture that saw sexual desire as sinful, and that culture isn't entirely gone. It coexists with the compulsory-sexuality culture asexuals accurately describe and chafe against.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.